Integration of MBBR process with electrocoagulation treatment: An optimization by response surface method

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 PGTD of Electronics and Computer Science, Rashtrasant Tukadoji Maharaj Nagpur University, Nagpur, India

2 G. H. Raisoni College of Engineering & Management, Nagpur, India

3 Government College of Engineering, Sector 27, Mihan Rehabilitation Colony, Khapri Railway, Nagpur. India

Abstract

The present study investigates the effectiveness of low-cost sewage treatment methodologies, specifically the Moving Bed Biological Reactor (MBBR). To increase its applicability, it is essential to enhance the efficiency of the process. For that, a supplementary treatment known as electrocoagulation is employed. Crucial design parameters of the MBBR, such as Filling Ratio (Volume of Media/Active Volume of Digester) and Hydraulic Retention Time (HRT), were examined through a laboratory setup. Additionally, parameters related to the electrocoagulation process, like Voltage, Detention Time, and inter-electrode distance, were also examined An HRT of 12 hours was observed to yield an 88% reduction in Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) and a 92% reduction in Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD). The efficiency of the process was enhanced when the filling ratio varied in the range of 30 to 70%. Electrocoagulation demonstrates optimal turbidity removal at voltages ranging from 10 to 12 volts, with the most effective inter-electrode distance measured at 3 centimeters. The optimal detention period for the EC process was determined to be 150 minutes. This study provides valuable information regarding the use of a statistical tool called the Central Composite Design (CCD) for investigating the inter-relations between an operating variable and its effect on the responses of the treatment unit. The results show that a statistical technique could be used to improve the overall performance of the treatment unit.

Graphical Abstract

Integration of MBBR process with electrocoagulation treatment: An optimization by response surface method

Keywords

Main Subjects


[1] Stephan, L., Wichern, M., & Hilliges, R. (2024). Elimination of residual chemical oxygen demand (COD) in a low-temperature post-denitrifying moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR). Water, 16(13), 1829.
https://doi.org/10.3390/w16131829
[2] de Moura-Júnior, J. C. R., de Brito, P. C., Ribeiro, R. P., Kligerman, D. C., & Oliveira, J. L. M. (2024). Nitrogen removal and nitrous oxide emission from moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) under different loads and airflow. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 12(3), 112574.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2024.112574
[3] Vielhauer, R. (2023). Removal of toxic metal Cd (II) by Serratia bozhouensis CdIW2 using in moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR). Journal of Environmental Management, 344, 118361.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118361
[4] Pethe, A., & Debnath, M. (2024). Wastewater treatment using moving bed biofilm reactor technology: A case study of ceramic industry. Water Environment Research, 96(4), e11026.
https://doi.org/10.1002/wer.11026
[5] Uddin, M., Islam, M. K., & Dev, S. (2024). Investigation of the performance of the combined moving bed bioreactor-membrane bioreactor (MBBR-MBR) for textile wastewater treatment. Heliyon, 10(7), e31358.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31358
[6] Jegadeesan, C., Somanathan, A., Jeyakumar, R. B., & Sharmila, V. G. (2022). Combination of electrocoagulation with solar photo Fenton process for treatment of landfill leachate. Environmental Technology, 43(25), 3845-3889.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2022.2093654
[7] Hameed, Y. T., Hameed, M. A., & Aday, L. A. (2022). Continuous flow electrocoagulation process in combination with other treatment processes: A review of current applications and approaches. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2589(1), 012079.
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0108349
[8] Graça, N. S., & Rodrigues, A. E. (2022). The combined implementation of electrocoagulation and adsorption processes for the treatment of wastewaters. Clean Technologies, 4(4), 1020–1053.
https://doi.org/10.3390/cleantechnol4040063
[9] Esteki, S., Karsaz, M., Ghofrani, B., Yegani, R., & Majidi, S. (2024). Combination of membrane bioreactor with chemical coagulation for the treatment of real pharmaceutical wastewater: Comparison of simultaneous and consecutive pre-treatment of coagulation on MBR performance. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 58, 105108.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2024.105108
[10] Biswas, K., Taylor, M. W., & Turner, S. J. (2014). Successional development of biofilms in moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) systems treating municipal wastewater. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 98(3), 1429–1440.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-013-5082-8
[11] Thakare, U., Kimmatkar, H., Shende, P., Raut, S., & Ruprai, B. S. (2023). Design of 50KLD MBBR based sewage treatment for hostel building, Nagpur. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology, 11(4), 3948–3952.
https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2023.51145
[12] Li, M., Liu, Y., Zhou, X., Wang, N., & Yuan, B. (2023). A study on the carriers compound multi-stage MBBR biological treatment process for domestic sewage. Sustainability, 15(10), 7922.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su15107922
[13] Sonwani, R. K., Jaiswal, R. P., Rai, B. N., & Singh, R. S. (2021). Moving bed biofilm reactor- (MBBR-) based advanced wastewater treatment technology for the removal of emerging contaminants. In N. S. G. P. M. F. N. E. K. S. M. F. I. (Ed.), Development in wastewater treatment research and processes: Removal of emerging contaminants from wastewater through bio-nanotechnology (pp. 349–370). Elsevier.
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-85583-9.00020-X
[14] Ali, I., Basheer, A. A., Kumar, R., Aslam, M., El-Sayed, O. S., & Hassan, S. B. (2023). Hybrid electrocoagulation-biological treatment techniques for industrial wastewater: A comprehensive review. Journal of Environmental Management, 330, 117201.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.117201
[15] Garg, V. K., Yadav, A., Saharan, P., & Singh, V. P. (2022). Performance evaluation of hybrid electrocoagulation-MBBR system for tannery wastewater treatment. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 27, 102555.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2022.102555
[16] Sah, S., Feroz, A., & Singh, P. (2023). Role of filling ratio in MBBR performance: A comprehensive review. Environmental Engineering Research, 28(2), 300–312.
https://doi.org/10.4491/eer.2023.084
[17] Kumar, P. R., Nawaz, T., & Singh, S. P. (2024). Evaluation and optimization of electrocoagulation process parameters for the treatment of oil industry drilling site wastewater [Preprint]. Research Square.
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4157348/v1
[18] Li, Z., Chen, H. L., Zhang, J., Peng, M. F., & Han, W. (2022). Combined application analysis of MBBR and magnetic coagulation process in a full-scale project. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 49, 102955.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2022.102955
[19] AL-Rubaye, S. F. A., Alhaboubi, N. A., & Al-Allaq, A. H. (2024). Factors affecting electrocoagulation process for different water types: A review. Al-Khawarizmi Engineering Journal, 20(1), 16–29.
https://doi.org/10.22153/kej.2024.10.001
[20] Arabameri, A., Alavi Moghaddam, M. R., Azadmehr, A., & Shabestar, M. P. (2022). Less energy and material consumption in an electrocoagulation system using AC waveform instead of DC for nickel removal: Process optimization through RSM. Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification, 174, 108869.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2022.108869
[21] Muchlis, A. A. S., Widyarani, E. S., Eduardus, B. N., & Naufal, F. (2021). Cost optimization of tannery wastewater treatment by electrocoagulation process with iron electrode under various DC voltage and electricity consumption. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 623(1), 012079.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/623/1/012079
[22] Shabestar, M. P., Moghaddam, M. R. A., & Karamati-Niaragh, E. (2021). Evaluation of energy and electrode consumption of Acid Red 18 removal using electrocoagulation process through RSM: Alternating and direct current. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(47), 66679–66688.
https://doi.org/10.1007/S11356-021-15345-9
[23] Majid, A. (2019). Application of lab-scale MBBR to treat industrial wastewater using K3 carriers: Effects of HRT, high COD influent, and temperature. International Journal of Environmental Sciences & Natural Resources, 20(2), 556031.
https://doi.org/10.19080/ijesnr.2019.20.556031
[24] Cescon, A., & Jiang, J. Q. (2020). Filtration process and alternative filter media material in water treatment. Water, 12(12), 3377.
https://doi.org/10.3390/w12123377
[25] Ahmed, W., & Hassanien, M. (2004). Physico-chemical pre-treatment for drinking water. University of Khartoum, Khartoum (Sudan).
[26] Farouk, R., Elmolla, A., Abdallah, A., & Attia, M. (2022). Effect of spacing of different types of electrodes in the electrocoagulation process. In Journal of Al-Azhar University Engineering Sector 17(64), 297-304).
[27] Liu, Y., Wang, N., Wei, Y., Dang, K., Li, M., Li, Y., Li, Q., & Mu, R. (2020). Pilot study on the upgrading configuration of UASB-MBBR with two carriers: Treatment effect, sludge reduction and functional microbial identification. Process Biochemistry, 99, 211–221.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2020.09.007
[28] Li, C., Liang, J., Lin, X., Xu, H., Tadda, M. A., Lan, L., & Liu, D. (2019). Fast start-up strategies of MBBR for mariculture wastewater treatment. Journal of Environmental Management, 248, 109267.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109267
[29] Linares-Hernández, I., Barrera-Díaz, C., Bilyeu, B., Juárez-García Rojas, P., & Campos-Medina, E. (2010). A combined electrocoagulation-electrooxidation treatment for industrial wastewater. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 175(1-3), 688–694.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.10.064
[30] Rangseesuriyachai, H., Boonnorat, J., Glanpracha, N., Khetkorn, W., Thiamngoen, P., & Pinpatthanapong, K. (2023). Anaerobic co-digestion of elephant dung and biological pretreated Napier grass: Synergistic effect and kinetics of methane production. Biomass and Bioenergy, 175, 106849.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2023.106849
[31] Rahimi, Y., Torabian, A., Mehrdadi, N., Habibi-Rezaie, M., Pezeshk, H., & Nabi-Bidhendi, G. R. (2011). Optimizing aeration rates for minimizing membrane fouling and its effect on sludge characteristics in a moving bed membrane bioreactor. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 186(2-3), 1097–1102.
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JHAZMAT.2010.11.117
[32] Golshahi, M., Farrokhi, M., & Mohammad Nejad, S. (2017). Determine performance system MBBR in reduction COD sewage and comparison with conventional activated sludge system. Journal of Environmental Health Engineering, 4(2), 104-114.
https://doi.org/10.18869/ACADPUB.JEHE.4.2.104
[33] Sindhi, Y., & Shah, M. (2015). Lab scale study on moving bed biofilm reactor-an effective perspective in biological wastewater treatment. International Journal for Advanced Research in Engineering, Science and Management, 1(5).
http://ijaresm.net/Pepar/VOLUME_1/ISSUE_5/24.pdf
[34] Jasem, Y. I., Jumaha, G. F., & Ghawi, A. H. (2018). Treatment of medical wastewater by moving bed bioreactor system. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 19(5), 135–140.
https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/86152
[35] Sidek, L. M., Aziz, H. A., Omar, F. M., Mohamad, M., & Halmi, M. I. E. (2015). Experimental comparison between moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) and conventional activated sludge (CAS) for river purification treatment plant. Advanced Materials Research, 1113, 806–811.
https://doi.org/10.4028/WWW.SCIENTIFIC.NET/AMR.1113.806
[36] Shailesh R, P., Vyas, D. S., & Pamnani, A. N. (2016). Study the efficiency of moving bed bio-film reactor (MBBR) for dairy wastewater treatment. International Journal of Advance Research and Innovative Ideas in Education, 2(3), 899–905.
http://ijariie.com/AdminUploadPdf/STUDY
Said, N. I., & Santoso, T. I. (2015). Penghilangan polutan organik dan padatan terrsuspensi di dalam air limbah domestik dengan proses Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor (MBBR). Journal Air Indonesia, 8(1), 245240.
https://doi.org/10.29122/JAI.V8I1.2382
[37] Hung, D. P., Oanh, L. T. K., Chi, V. T. D., Thinh, L. N. Q., Nguyen, D. T., Tuan, N. Q., & Huynh, N. H. (2021). Applicability assessment of electrocoagulation in real dyeing wastewater treatment. Nature Environment and Pollution Technology, 20(2), 395–403.
https://doi.org/10.46488/NEPT.2021.v20i02.015
[38] Cañizares, P., Martínez, F., Jiménez, C., Sáez, C., & Rodrigo, M. A. (2009). Technical and economic comparison of conventional and electrochemical coagulation processes. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, 84(5), 702–710.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.2102
[39] Ucevli, G., & Kaya, Y. (2021). A comparative study of membrane filtration, electrocoagulation, chemical coagulation and their hybrid processes for greywater treatment. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 9(1), 104946.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2020.104946
[40] Kumari, S., & Kumar, R. N. (2020). Electrocoagulation for COD, turbidity, ammonia and phosphate removal from municipal wastewater. Zenodo.
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5638407