Enhancing biogas production using ultrasound-assisted thermal pretreatment technology for anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge and microalgae substrates

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Renewable Energies Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Energy Engineering, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

2 Department of Energy Systems Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Energy Engineering, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

The study aimed to assess the effects of ultrasound-assisted thermal pretreatment on biogas production by co-digesting stress-adapted microalgae (Synechocystis sp.) with a combination of mixed municipal and industrial sewage sludge under anaerobic conditions. The pretreatment process involved subjecting the microalgae biomass to thermal pretreatment at temperatures of 70, 90, and 110oC while utilizing ultrasound pretreatment for the sludge (with an average solids content of 16.7 g/L) at a frequency of 25 kHz and power output of 400 W for durations of 3, 9, and 15 minutes before the main digestion process. The experiment was designed using response surface methodology (RSM) with a central composite design. The results revealed that the model exhibited statistical significance, with a probability value (Prob > F) of less than 0.05. Pre-treated samples demonstrated a substantial increase in biogas production compared to untreated samples, showing an average 1.4 to 5.6-fold enhancements. Optimization analysis indicated that the highest cumulative biogas production, amounting to 706 NmL, could be achieved after two weeks by pre-heating the microalgae cells at 110oC for one hour and subjecting the sewage sludge to ultrasound pretreatment for three minutes. These findings highlight the potential of ultrasound-assisted thermal pretreatment technology as a strategy to enhance biogas production through the co-digestion of stress-resilient microalgae and sewage sludge.

Graphical Abstract

Enhancing biogas production using ultrasound-assisted thermal pretreatment technology for anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge and microalgae substrates

Keywords

Main Subjects


[1] Connor, R., Faurès, J. M., Kuylenstierna, J., Margat, J., Steduto, P., Vallée, D. Hoe, W. V. D. , 2009. Chapter 7: Evolution of  water use., in The United Nations World Water Development Report 3–Water in a Changing World, E.K. (WWAP), Editor.  London, UNESCO: London.
[2] Matsuo, Y., A. Yanagisawa, and Y. Yamashita, (2013). A global energy outlook to 2035 with strategic considerations for Asia and Middle East energy supply and demand interdependencies. Energy strategy reviews2(1), 79-91. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2013.04.002
[3] Connor, R., et al., (2017). The United Nations World Water Development Report 2017. Wastewater: The Untapped Resource, Facts and Figures in "WWAP (United Nations World Water Assessment Programme). : Paris, UNESCO.
[4] UNWWAP, W., (2017). The United Nations World Water Development Report 2017-Wastewater: The untapped resource, UNESCO, Paris.
[5] Jones, E.R., et al., (2021). Country-level and gridded estimates of wastewater production, collection, treatment and reuse. Earth Syst. Sci. Data13(2), 237-254. 
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-237-2021
[6] Abedi, S., et al., (2019). Decoupling a novel Trichormus variabilis-Synechocystis sp. interaction to boost phycoremediation. Scientific reports9(1), 2511.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-38997-7
[7] Tyagi, V. K., Lo, S. L. (2013). Sludge: a waste or renewable source for energy and resources recovery? Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 25, 708-728.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.05.029
[8] Hajinezhad, A., et al., (2015). Biodiesel production from Norouzak (Salvia lerifolia) seeds as an indigenous source of bio fuel in Iran using ultrasound. Energy conversion and management, 99, 132-140. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2015.04.034
[9] Abedi, S., A. Nozarpour, and O. Tavakoli, (2023). Evaluation of Biogas Production Rate and Leachate Treatment in Landfill Through a Water-Energy Nexus Framework for Integrated Waste Management. Energy nexus, 11, 100218. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nexus.2023.100218
[10] Abedi, S., M. Khaleghi, and A. Naemi, (2021). Bioenergy Production Potential Using Anaerobic Digestion of Wastewater Sludge (Case study: Sabzevar Wastewater Treatment Plant) in 5th International Conference on Applied Researches in Science and Engineering, University of Amsterdam.
[11] Khanh Nguyen, V., et al., (2021). Review on pretreatment techniques to improve anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge. Fuel285, 119105. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119105
[12] Verbeeck, K., et al., (2018). Upgrading the value of anaerobic digestion via chemical production from grid injected biomethane. Energy and environmental science11(7), 1788-1802. 
http://doi.org/10.1039/C8EE01059E
[13] Kaparaju, P., Rintala, J. (2013). Generation of heat and power from biogas for stationary applications: boilers, gas engines and turbines, combined heat and power (CHP) plants and fuel cells. In The biogas handbook (pp. 404-427). Woodhead Publishing.
[14] Uddin, M.M. and M.M. Wright, (2022). Anaerobic digestion fundamentals, challenges, and technological advances. Physical Sciences Reviews.
https://doi.org/10.1515/psr-2021-0068
[15] Aryal, N., et al., (2018). An overview of microbial biogas enrichment. Bioresource Technology,  264, 359-369. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.06.013
[16] Nguyen, V.K., et al., (2021). Review on pretreatment techniques to improve anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge. Fuel,  285, 119105. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119105
[17] Mahmudul, H.M., et al., (2017). Production, characterization and performance of biodiesel as an alternative fuel in diesel engines – A review. Renewable and Sustainable energy reviews72, 497-509. 
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.001
[18] Patinvoh, R.J. and M.J. Taherzadeh, (2019). Challenges of biogas implementation in developing countries. Current opinion in environmental science and health,  12, 30-37.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coesh.2019.09.006.
[19] Van, D.P., et al., (2020). A review of anaerobic digestion systems for biodegradable waste: Configurations, operating parameters, and current trends. Environmental engineering research,  25(1), 1-17. 
https://doi.org/10.4491/eer.2018.334
[20] Liu, C.-f., et al., (2008). Prediction of methane yield at optimum pH for anaerobic digestion of organic fraction of municipal solid waste. Bioresource technology99(4), 882-888. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.01.013
[21] Latif, A., C. Mehta, and D. Batstone, (2017). Influence of low pH on continuous anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge. Water research113
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.02.002
[22] Liu, J., et al., (2020). Enhanced anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge by thermal or alkaline-thermal pretreatments: Influence of hydraulic retention time reduction. International journal of hydrogen energy45(4), 2655-2667. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.11.198
[23] Hallaji, S.M., M. Kuroshkarim, and S.P. Moussavi, (2019). Enhancing methane production using anaerobic co-digestion of waste activated sludge with combined fruit waste and cheese whey. BMC Biotechnology19(1), 19. 
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12896-019-0513-y
[24] Hassanpourmoghadam, L., et al., (2023). Effect of Fe3O4 nanoparticles on anaerobic digestion of municipal wastewater sludge. Biomass and Bioenergy,  169, 106692. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2022.106692
[25] Laiq Ur Rehman, M., et al., (2019). Anaerobic digestion. Water environment research91(10), 1253-1271. 
https://doi.org/10.1002/wer.1219
[26] Oladejo, J., et al. (2019). A Review of Sludge-to-Energy Recovery Methods. Energies, 12.   
https://doi.org/10.3390/en12010060
[27] Heidari, A., Taheri, A., Rezaei, M., Jahanbakhshi, A. (2023). Biogas production and electrical power potential, challenges and barriers from municipal solid waste (MSW) for developing countries: A review study in Iran, Journal of agriculture and food research, 13, 100668.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2023.100668
[28] De Mes, T. Z. D., Stams, A. J. M., Reith, J. H., Zeeman, G. (2003). Methane production by anaerobic digestion of wastewater and solid wastes. Bio-methane and Bio-hydrogen, 2003, 58-102.
[29] Chow, W.L., et al., (2020). Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Wastewater Sludge: A Review of Potential Co-Substrates and Operating Factors for Improved Methane Yield. Processes8(1), 39. 
https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8010039
[30] Nwokolo, N., et al., (2020). Waste to Energy: A Focus on the Impact of Substrate Type in Biogas Production. Processes,  8(10), 1224. 
[31] Gebreeyessus, G.D. and P. Jenicek, (2016). Thermophilic versus mesophilic anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge: A comparative review. Bioengineering (Basel)3(2). 
https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering3020015
[32] Odirile, P.T., et al. (2021). Anaerobic digestion for biogas production from municipal sewage sludge: A comparative study between fine mesh sieved primary sludge and sedimented primary sludge. Water, 13.  
https://doi.org/10.3390/w13243532
[33] Odirile, P.T., et al., (2021). Anaerobic digestion for biogas production from municipal sewage sludge: A comparative study between fine mesh sieved primary sludge and sedimented primary sludge. Water13(24), 3532.
https://doi.org/10.3390/w13243532
[34] An, D., et al., (2017). Effects of total solids content on performance of sludge mesophilic anaerobic digestion and dewaterability of digested sludge. Waste management62, 188-193. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.01.042
[35] Sebola, M., E. Muzenda, and H. Tesfagiorgis, (2015). Effect of particle size on anaerobic digestion of different feedstocks. South African journal of chemical engineering20(3), 11-26.
[36] Thorin, E., et al., (2018). Co-digestion of sewage sludge and microalgae – Biogas production investigations. Applied energy227, 64-72. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.08.085
[37] Lage, S., A. Toffolo, and F.G. Gentili, (2021). Microalgal growth, nitrogen uptake and storage, and dissolved oxygen production in a polyculture based-open pond fed with municipal wastewater in Northern Sweden. Chemosphere,  276, 130122. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130122
[38] Ugurlu, A. and E. Kendir, (2018). A comprehensive review on pretreatment of microalgae for biogas production. International journal of energy research42
https://doi.org/10.1002/er.4100
[39] Yu, Y., et al., (2013). Development of Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 as a Phototrophic Cell Factory. Marine drugs11(8), 2894-2916.
https://doi.org/10.3390/md11082894
[40] Ometto, F., et al., (2014). Impacts of microalgae pre-treatments for improved anaerobic digestion: Thermal treatment, thermal hydrolysis, ultrasound and enzymatic hydrolysis. Water research65, 350-361.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2014.07.040
[41] Mendez, L., et al., (2013). Enhancing methane production of Chlorella vulgaris via thermochemical pretreatments. Bioresour technol,  149, 136-41. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.08.136.
[42] Abedi, S., et al., (2019). Bioenergy production using Trichormus variabilis–a review. Biofuels, Bioproducts and biorefining13, 1365-1382.  
https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.2023
[43] Abedi, S., et al., (2017). Evaluation of Biomass Production and Wastewater Nutrient Removal Using Microalgae: Sustainable Strategy to CO2 Bio-Fixation and Bioenergy Production Approach. Journal of renewable energy and environment4(4), 39-48. 
https://doi.org/10.30501/jree.2017.88374
[44] Kannah, R.Y., et al., (2021). A Mini Review of Biochemical Conversion of Algal Biorefinery. Energy and fuels35(21), 16995-17007. 
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c02294
[45] Siami, S., et al., (2020). Process optimization and effect of thermal, alkaline, H2O2 oxidation and combination pretreatment of sewage sludge on solubilization and anaerobic digestion. BMC Biotechnology20(1), 21. 
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12896-020-00614-1
[46] Gahlot, P., et al., (2022). Principles and potential of thermal hydrolysis of sewage sludge to enhance anaerobic digestion. Environmental research214, 113856. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.113856
[47] Mitraka, G.-C., et al., (2022). A Comprehensive Review on Pretreatment Methods for Enhanced Biogas Production from Sewage Sludge. Energies15(18), 6536. 
https://doi.org/10.3390/en15186536.
[48] Karouach, F., et al., (2020). Effect of combined mechanical–ultrasonic pretreatment on mesophilic anaerobic digestion of household organic waste fraction in Morocco. Energy reports6, 310-314. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2019.11.081
[49] Pilli, S., et al., (2011). Ultrasonic pretreatment of sludge: A review. Ultrasonics sonochemistry18(1), 1-18. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2010.02.014
[50] Bhatia, S.K., et al., (2020). Recent developments in pretreatment technologies on lignocellulosic biomass: Effect of key parameters, technological improvements, and challenges. Bioresource technology300, 122724. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122724
[51] Du, X., et al., (2019). Synergistic methane production from the anaerobic co-digestion of Spirulina platensis with food waste and sewage sludge at high solid concentrations. Renewable energy142, 55-61. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.04.062
[52] Gonçalves, R.F., et al., (2020). Co-digestion of municipal wastewater and microalgae biomass in an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor. Algal research52, 102117. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2020.102117
[53] Wang, X., et al., (2022). Synergetic utilization of sewage sludge and microalgae: A review and proposal. Bioresource technology reports19, 101146. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2022.101146
[54] Safieddin Ardebili, S., (2020). Green electricity generation potential from biogas produced by anaerobic digestion of farm animal waste and agriculture residues in Iran. Renewable energy154
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.02.102
[55] Staley, J.T., (2006). The bacterial species dilemma and the genomic-phylogenetic species concept. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci361(1475), 1899-909.
https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2006.1914
[56] Selvankumar, T., et al., (2017). Process optimization of biogas energy production from cow dung with alkali pre-treated coffee pulp. 3 Biotech7(4), 254. 
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-017-0884-5
[57] Zeynali, R., M. Khojastehpour, and M. Ebrahimi-Nik, (2017). Effect of ultrasonic pre-treatment on biogas yield and specific energy in anaerobic digestion of fruit and vegetable wholesale market wastes. Sustainable environment research27
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.serj.2017.07.001
[58] Yuan, X., et al., (2014). Enhancing the anaerobic digestion of lignocellulose of municipal solid waste using a microbial pretreatment method. Bioresour technol154, 1-9. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.11.090
[59] Mohammadi, S., et al., (2022). Optimization of a three-dimensional electrochemical process with granular activated carbon for diclofenac removal using response surface methodology. Environmental progress and sustainable energy41(1), e13715.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.13715
[60] Wang, M., et al., (2017). Thermal pretreatment of microalgae for biomethane production: experimental studies, kinetics and energy analysis. Journal of chemical technology and biotechnology92(2), 399-407. 
https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.5018
[61] Petrovič, A., et al., (2022). The advantages of co-digestion of vegetable oil industry by-products and sewage sludge: Biogas production potential, kinetic analysis and digestate valorisation. Journal of environmental management318, 115566. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115566
[62] Li, L., et al., (2021). Short-chain fatty acids resource recovery potential from algal sludge via anaerobic fermentation under various pH values. Chemosphere275, 129954. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.129954
[63] Córdova, A., et al. (2022). Recent advances in the application of enzyme processing assisted by ultrasound in Agri-Foods: A review. Catalysts, 12(1),107.   
https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12010107
[64] Subhedar, P.B. and P.R. Gogate, (2014). Enhancing the activity of cellulase enzyme using ultrasonic irradiations. Journal of molecular catalysis B: Enzymatic101, 108-114. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcatb.2014.01.002
[65] Mawson, R., et al., 2011. Ultrasound in enzyme activation and inactivation, in ultrasound technologies for food and bioprocessing, H. Feng, G. Barbosa-Canovas, and J. Weiss, Editors.  Springer New York: New York, NY.369-404.
[66] Tian, X., W.J. Ng, and A.P. Trzcinski, (2018). Optimizing the synergistic effect of sodium hydroxide/ultrasound pre-treatment of sludge. Ultrasonics sonochemistry48, 432-440. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2018.07.005
[67] Lizama, A.C., et al., (2017). Effects of ultrasonic pretreatment on the solubilization and kinetic study of biogas production from anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge. International biodeterioration and biodegradation123, 1-9. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2017.05.020
[68] Kendir, E. and A. Ugurlu, (2018). A comprehensive review on pretreatment of microalgae for biogas production. International journal of energy research42(12), 3711-3731. 
https://doi.org/10.1002/er.4100
[69] Volschan Junior, I., R. de Almeida, and M.C. Cammarota, (2021). A review of sludge pretreatment methods and co-digestion to boost biogas production and energy self-sufficiency in wastewater treatment plants. Journal of water process engineering40, 101857. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101857
[70] Passos, F., et al., (2014). Pretreatment of microalgae to improve biogas production: A review. Bioresource technology172, 403-412. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.08.114
[71] Das, T., Al-Waili, I., Balasubramanian, V., Appleby, G., Kaparaju, P., Parthasarathy, R., Eshtiaghi, N. (2024). Process modelling and techno-economic analysis of anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge integrated with wet oxidation using a gravity pressure vessel and thermal hydrolysis. Science of the total environment, 912, 169024.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169024
[72] Wu, N., Moreira, C. M., Zhang, Y., Doan, N., Yang, S., Phlips, E. J., Pullammanappallil, P. C. (2019). Techno-economic analysis of biogas production from microalgae through anaerobic digestion. Anaerobic digestion, 113-117.
https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.86090