Comparison of environmental risks of drilling operations of cluster and single ring models

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Environment, Management Faculty, Islamic Azad University, West Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran

2 Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, West Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to compare the environmental risks arising from two models of drilling operations of single-ring and clustered wells in the land area, and finally, to select the most appropriate drilling operations to reduce environmental risks. For this purpose, after identifying the most important drilling activities of oil and gas wells and collecting the opinions of the statistical community, the risks arising from the activities in this field for both drilling models were identified and evaluated using the failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) method. Then, the best option was selected using the hierarchical analysis process technique, which is useful in prioritizing and selecting the best option. The location of drilling risks in the high and medium risk matrix was determined using the FMEA method for both models with 1<RPN<30. And using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) technique in the range of zero and one and between the single ring and cluster prioritized the techniques, and the best drilling technique for oil and gas wells, namely cluster drilling, was selected.

Keywords

Main Subjects


[1] Cunha, J. C. (2004, June). Risk analysis application for drilling operations. In Canadian international petroleum conference. OnePetro.
[2] Modarres, M., Risk analysis in engineering: techniques, tools, and trends. 2006: CRC press.
[3] Adedigba, S. A., Oloruntobi, O., Khan, F., Butt, S. (2018). Data-driven dynamic risk analysis of offshore drilling operations. Journal of petroleum science and engineering, 165, 444-452.
[4] Sinha, P. R., Whitman, L. E., Malzahn, D. (2004). Methodology to mitigate supplier risk in an aerospace supply chain. Supply chain management, 9(2) 154-168.
[5] Thun, J. H., Hoenig, D. (2011). An empirical analysis of supply chain risk management in the German automotive industry. International journal of production economics, 131(1), 242-249.
[6] Wagner, S. M., Bode, C. (2006). An empirical investigation into supply chain vulnerability. Journal of purchasing and supply management, 12(6), 301-312.
[7] Tazelaar, F., Snijders, C. (2013). Operational risk assessments by supply chain professionals: Process and performance. Journal of operations management, 31(1-2), 37-51
[8] Jensen, C., Johansson, M., Lindahl, M., Magnusson, T. (2001). Environmental Effect Analysis (EEA)–Principles and structure. Department of technology, University of Kalmar, Kalmar, Sweden.
[9] Vazdani, S., Sabzghabaei, G., Dashti, S., Cheraghi, M., Alizadeh, R., Hemmati, A. (2017). FMEA techniques used in environmental risk assessment. Environment and ecosystem science (EES), 1(2), 16-18.
[10] Dargahi, M. D., Naderi, S., Hashemi, S. A., Aghaiepour, M., Nouri, Z., Sahneh, S. K. (2016). Use FMEA method for environmental risk assessment in ore complex on wildlife habitats. Human and ecological risk assessment: an international journal, 22(5), 1123-1132.
[11] Braglia, M. (2000). MAFMA: multiā€attribute failure mode analysis. International journal of quality and reliability management, 17(9), 1017-1030.
[12] Chang, K. H. (2016). Generalized multi-attribute failure mode analysis. Neurocomputing, 175, 90-100.
[13] Carmignani, G. (2009). An integrated structural framework to cost-based FMECA: The priority-cost FMECA. Reliability engineering and system safety, 94(4), 861-871.
[14] Tzeng, G. H., Lin, C. W., Opricovic, S. (2005). Multi-criteria analysis of alternative-fuel buses for public transportation. Energy policy, 33(11), 1373-1383.
[15] Rondinelli, D., Berry, M. (2000). Multimodal transportation, logistics, and the environment: managing interactions in a global economy. European management journal, 18(4), 398-410.
[16] Oturakci, M., Dagsuyu, C. (2020). Integrated environmental risk assessment approach for transportation modes. Human and ecological risk assessment: an international journal, 26(2), 384-393.
[17] Amir-Heidari, P., Maknoon, R., Taheri, B., Bazyari, M. (2016). Identification of strategies to reduce accidents and losses in drilling industry by comprehensive HSE risk assessment—A case study in Iranian drilling industry. Journal of loss prevention in the process industries, 44, 405-413.
[18] Bratton, T., Edwards, S., Fuller, J., Murphy, L., Goraya, S., Harrold, T., Wright, B. (2001). Avoiding drilling problems. Oilfield review, 13(2), 32-51.
[19] Brandsæter, A. (2002). Risk assessment in the offshore industry. Safety science, 40(1-4), 231-269.
[20] Ismail, Z., Kong, K. K., Othman, S. Z., Law, K. H., Khoo, S. Y., Ong, Z. C., Shirazi, S. M. (2014). Evaluating accidents in the offshore drilling of petroleum: Regional picture and reducing impact. Measurement, 51, 18-33.
[21] Skogdalen, J. E., Vinnem, J. E. (2012). Quantitative risk analysis of oil and gas drilling, using Deepwater Horizon as case study. Reliability engineering and system safety, 100, 58-66.
[22] Lerche, I. (2012). Oil exploration: Basin analysis and economics. Academic Press.
[23] Lopez, J. L., Rappold, P. M., Ugueto, G. A., Wieseneck, J. B., Vu, C. K. (2004). Integrated shared earth model: 3D pore-pressure prediction and uncertainty analysis. The leading edge, 23(1), 52-59.
[24] Moos, D., Peska, P., Ward, C. (2008). U.S. patent No. 7,349,807. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and trademark office.
[25] Guan, Z., Sheng, Y. N., Xi, C. M., Luo, M., Li, W. (2018). Oil  gas drilling risk analysis utilizing quantitative risk assessment. Journal of applied science and engineering, 21(4), 541-546.
[26] Kaiser, M. J. (2019). Decommissioning forecasting and operating cost estimation: Gulf of Mexico well trends, structure inventory and forecast models. gulf professional publishing, p. 227-249.
[27] Abramov, A. (2019). Optimization of well pad design and drilling–well clustering. Petroleum exploration and development, 46(3), 614-620.
[28] Xia, L., Shun, X., Jiewen, W., Lan, M. (2020, June). Predicting oil production in single well using recurrent neural network. In 2020 international conference on big data, artificial intelligence and internet of things engineering (ICBAIE) (pp. 423-430). IEEE.
[29] Liu, H. C., You, J. X., Ding, X. F., Su, Q. (2015). Improving risk evaluation in FMEA with a hybrid multiple criteria decision making method. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 32(7) 763-782.
[30] Zhou, Q., Thai, V. V. (2016). Fuzzy and grey theories in failure mode and effect analysis for tanker equipment failure prediction. Safety science, 83, 74-79.
[31] Lo, H. W., Liou, J. J. (2018). A novel multiple-criteria decision-making-based FMEA model for risk assessment. Applied soft computing, 73, 684-696.
[32] Saaty, T. L. (1977). A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of mathematical psychology, 15(3), 234-281.
[33] Mondal, S., Maiti, R. (2013). Integrating the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and the frequency ratio (FR) model in landslide susceptibility mapping of Shiv-khola watershed, Darjeeling Himalaya. International journal of disaster risk science, 4(4), 200-212.
[34] Razandi, Y., Pourghasemi, H. R., Neisani, N. S., Rahmati, O. (2015). Application of analytical hierarchy process, frequency ratio, and certainty factor models for groundwater potential mapping using GIS. Earth science informatics, 8(4), 867-883.
[35] Mani Murali, R., Ankita, M., Amrita, S., Vethamony, P. (2013). Coastal vulnerability assessment of Puducherry coast, India, using the analytical hierarchical process. Natural hazards and earth system sciences, 13(12), 3291-3311.
[36] Sar, N., Chatterjee, S., Das Adhikari, M. (2015). Integrated remote sensing and GIS based spatial modelling through analytical hierarchy process (AHP) for water logging hazard, vulnerability and risk assessment in Keleghai river basin, India. Modeling earth systems and environment, 1(4), 1-21.
[37] Rimba, A. B., Setiawati, M. D., Sambah, A. B., Miura, F. (2017). Physical flood vulnerability mapping applying geospatial techniques in Okazaki City, Aichi Prefecture, Japan. Urban science, 1(1), 7.
[38] Bakke, T., Klungsøyr, J., Sanni, S. (2013). Environmental impacts of produced water and drilling waste discharges from the Norwegian offshore petroleum industry. Marine environmental research, 92, 154-169.
[39] Gharibi, V., Ghaedi Jahromi, M., Mohammadnia, M. R., Hosseini Gharbi, S. M. (2020). Environmental risk Aassessment of gas wells drilling effluents: integration of environmental failure mode and effects analysis and analytic network process models. Journal of health sciences and surveillance system, 8(1), 49-56.
Volume 7, Issue 4
November 2021
Pages 305-319
  • Receive Date: 20 October 2021
  • Revise Date: 15 February 2022
  • Accept Date: 19 February 2022
  • First Publish Date: 19 February 2022